Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Blog Post #2 or Scaffolding Instruction


Quick Update: I have approximately 2 weeks left on my KPTP unit with the Seniors and will begin teaching freshman over The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie starting tomorrow!!!!!

 

I always struggle with what I’m going to write about in these reflections but after reading this week’s assignment , I suddenly have inspiration! Peter Smagorinsky’s chapter over scaffolding instruction was a great support to the system that the district has implemented that I discussed in my last reflection. The “I Do, We Do, You Do” has been pretty revolutionary for me as my brain had never thought of instructing students this way. Smagorinsky further describes it as an approach that

“relies on instruction that begins with a teacher’s introduction of a concept or procedure through accessible materials, has the students work initially on learning the concept or procedure in small groups that enable exploration and error without penalty, and ultimately has the students working independently as they are weaned away from the teacher’s and fellow students’ support” (22).

One important thing to realize about this approach that Smagorinsky doesn’t address is that this isn’t something you would have to do for the entire lesson. Oftentimes, I try to think of points when my students will struggle with something. Having spent so much time with them, I’ve started to think in terms of what questions they will ask me and what things I will need to clarify. Oftentimes, some activities are relatively straightforward and I feel like my instructions are clear. However some worksheets I’ve given them can confuse them and I want to make sure they do the best work they can. I think that many times teachers think that they want their students to complete the worksheet or activity fully on their own, without help from anyone. We want them to be independent. However, I’ve come to realize that they can never be fully independent if they don’t fully understand the material. Therefore, I’ve tried to work through the first couple of questions or sections of a worksheet with them as a class and in their groups and once I feel like they fully grasp the goal of the activity/worksheet, I let them free to work on their own, as Smagorinsky suggests. Sometimes this may mean I do one problems/example with them, other times for a particularly hard concept, it may require us doing all but one example together.

In addition to this chapter being a support for the district’s ideas on instruction, I also found a few ideas presented in this chapter that stood out to me.

Smagorinsky said that Cindy O’Donnell-Allen said that she does not “want [her students] to rely on her for their interpretations, which she felt would do them little good once they left her class” (22). I know that a lot of my teachers simply told me what important information I needed  to know from a text. They often told me and my classmates how we should be analyzing it and viewing it. When I got to college, I was surprised when the professors did a little of both. They allowed us to share our opinions and also shared theirs. I think it’s natural for us to want to share the information we know or we have taken from a particular work. We payed a lot of money for our education! We should show that! However, I try and hold off my views until they have shared theirs or simply tell them I agree with them. I’ve noticed that many of my students come up with the same views that I have and once they share it there is no reason for me to share.

These are just a few views that I took from this week’s reading and some connections I made while reading it. I hope you all are enjoying student teaching and everything is going well!!